Yesterday a bearish report from Citi Investment Research analyst Keith Horowitz sent Bank of America shares 12% lower. The analyst announced that he was expecting further deterioration in Bank of America’s earnings, by cutting his projection for 2009 EPS to just $0.25/share. Given this information, the current quarterly dividend of $0.32/share might not be sustainable.
The analyst expects that Bank of America might have to cut its dividend again, which could happen as early as January 20, when the company reports its latest quarterly results.
As a long-term investor, I typically ignore articles like that, since I seriously doubt that anyone in the investment banking community has any sustainable forecasting abilities. Instead I try to focus on something that is not as volatile as stock prices – I focus on a diversified list of companies from a variety of industries that have consistently grown their dividends over time. Nobody knows where the market is going to be in one year, five years or a decade. If you are able however to pick the best dividend stocks for the long run, you will be able to generate enough dividend income from your portfolio that would cushion any unsustainably severe bear market declines.
In the case of Bank of America however, I won’t be surprised if the company does indeed cut its dividends as it faces further writedowns, frozen credit markets and TARP restrictions. Several once prominent banks have cut their dividends twice since early 2008. Investors who were hoping that the worst is over suffered significant declines in their passive incomes again and again. Some fresh examples of this include FITB, C and KEY.
In summary I believe that the issue of Bank of America’s dividends is not if it will cut, but when it will do so. Historically, one of the main reasons why companies have lost their dividend aristocrats status between 1989 and 2004 is dividend freezes or cuts related to merging two different companies or restructuring ongoing operations. In the case of BAC, the company has purchased Countrywide and Merryl Lynch, which definitely will pose huge integration issues. These integration issues might make the company’s business less transparent, which could also mean that BAC might not be a good value even at $11/share.
Relevant Articles:
- Bank of America (BAC) Dividend Analysis
- Why do I like Dividend Aristocrats?
- Historical changes of the S&P Dividend Aristocrats
- Dividend Aristocrats List for 2009
Popular Posts
-
My retirement strategy is based on living off dividends . A successful retirement strategy is dependent on the asset returns you hold in you...
-
The last two weeks have been a little turbulent. Those tariff news really seem to have spooked markets worldwide. Luckily, we are Dividend ...
-
The stock market has been turbulent the past month or so. As a dividend growth investor, I usually ignore the ups and downs of the market. ...
-
Last week, there were nine companies that raised dividends in the US. Only two of those companies have managed to raise dividends for at lea...
-
“In bear markets, stocks return to their rightful owners.” - J.P. Morgan I love this quote. It summarizes a ton of insights into a simple,...
-
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) provides branded consumer packaged goods worldwide. It operates through five segments: Beauty; Groomin...
-
I was reviewing my old files and re-visited an interesting paper from Standard & Poor's from a few years ago about the importance of...
-
I review the list of dividend increases as part of my monitoring process. There were 15 companies that increased dividends last week. Ten of...
-
I review the list of dividend increases every week as part of my monitoring process. Dividend increases provide signaling value to me in my ...
-
The past few months have been difficult for many investors. Stocks are down from their all time highs, reached just a few months ago. It is ...
