Last week Wells Fargo (WFC) reported better than expected first quarter EPS of $0.55/share. If the company manages to maintain earnings at the current rate, the annual EPS would jump up to $2.20/share. That puts the forward P/E ratio at 9, which is pretty low, and makes the stock pretty attractive at current levels.
At the same time however Wells Fargo has cut its quarterly dividends from $0.34/share to $0.05/share. At the current stock price shareholders are getting a mere 1% yield. If things were really as great as the most recent quarterly report suggested, then the dividend should not have been cut so severely.
Dividends are typically real cash that companies pay out to their shareowners. Unlike earnings, which could be manipulated back and forth to show rosy sand castles, dividends are real cash that cannot be created out of thin air. Thus management commitment to a dividend policy of consistent increases shows confidence in the business model of the company and its ability to allocate cash flows effectively.
If the situation was that great at Wells Fargo, then the company doesn’t expect these record profits to be sustained over the course of the next few quarters, based off the severity of the dividend cut in March. Now some analysts would claim that the dividend cut was necessary in order for Wells Fargo either to have the cash to repay the treasury’s TARP money earlier, to maintain its Tangible Common Equity Ratio, or to conserve cash as financing is difficult to obtain during a credit crunch.
Even if management really believed that operating momentum is sustained and that annual earnings per share would grow at double-digit rates, unless the board decides to share the new prosperity with shareholders by raising the dividends or buying back stock, investors have few tangible options to profit from the prosperity. Of course stock prices could go higher if earnings go higher, but that’s not always the case. If you are betting on the greater fool theory to profit in the stock market however, you might join the crowd of 90% of active traders who consistently lose money. If you want to invest intelligently and not speculate blindly, you would pass Wells Fargo at this moment.
I do have high hopes for the company and would consider purchasing stock in it when the dividend growth policy is re-instituted. Until then there are many other opportunities for slow and steady total returns with much less risk considering.
Full Disclosure: None
Relevant Articles:
- The Dividend Edge
- Wells Fargo Joins the Crowd of Dividend Cutters
- TARP is bad for dividend investors
- Which Bank will be next? Follow the dividend cuts
- Best CD Rates
Popular Posts
-
The Dividend Aristocrats list includes S&P 500 companies which have managed to increase dividends for at least 25 consecutive years. I ...
-
A dividend champion is a company which has a 25 year record of annual dividend increases. There are only 146 such companies in the US toda...
-
The year 2024 was a record one for US Dividends. This was fueled by continued increase in earnings and by the initiation of dividends for th...
-
It's fascinating that US Dividends rarely decrease. They have gone up every year, for over 80 years. The only decreases in US divide...
-
Nothing is certain in this world except for death and taxes. For many dividend growth investors , this could be characterized as a feeling t...
-
I review the dividend increases weekly, as part of my monitoring process. I haven't done this review so far in 2025, as there were too f...
-
Dividend Growth Investing (DGI) is a strategic approach to stock market investing that prioritizes companies known for consistently increasi...
-
Charlie Munger would have turned 101 today. Sadly, he passed away in November. While that is sad news, the knowledge he shared with the wor...
-
A dividend king is a company that has managed to increase dividends to shareholders for at least 50 years in a row. There are only 47 such ...
-
The S&P Dividend Aristocrats index tracks companies in the S&P 500 that have increased dividends every year for at least 25 years ...