I was asked before about the reasoning behind my statement that I would buy a stock whose dividend is increasing even by one percentage point per year, if it has a high yield, rather than invest in stocks which increase their dividend payment by at least 10% per year. To answer this question, lets me walk you through my calculations:
Let’s say that you have 2 stocks- A and B in each of which we invest $100,000. We assume that both stocks will always trade at $10 for simplicity sake. Stock A is yielding 5% per year (50 cents per share), while Stock B is yielding 2% (20 cents per share). The dividend growth in Stock A is a meager 1%, while Stock B’s dividend is growing at 5% annually. We will look at two outputs – total return and changes in annual income. It would take stock B 24 years to reach the same annual income level as stock A. In addition, it would take stock B around 40 years to achieve the same total dollar return as stock A. If however we had a growth stock C, which was yielding .5 % at the start of the experiment, and whose dividend was growing at 10% annually, it would take the annual income around 27 years to reach Stock A’s dividend income. It would also take around 42 years for the total dollar return of Stock C to reach the total dollar return of Stock A. I have also included a $100,000 investment in bonds, which yield 6% every year.
The return from the invested capital though, would have been increasing substantially over time assuming that we didn’t reinvest our dividends back into our stocks. After 10 years the yield on cost for Stock A is 5.5%, Stock B is 3.3% and Stock C is 1.3%. After 10 more years stocks A, B and C are yielding 6.1%, 5.3% and 3.4%. An investor, who simply purchased bonds, would have been making the same 6% over and over. I am attaching my spreadsheet below. This file is for informational purposes only; I just tried to make my point that you have to not only buy a stock which has a high dividend growth rate, but also a one which has a pretty decent yield. A major limitation of this analysis was that I assumed that stocks would not realize any capital gains over the period; that’s why the long-term results of Stocks A, B and C are almost identical to long-term results for Bonds. However it shows you that if you reinvest dividends, stocks achieve a higher compounding power than bonds.
You can see the file here or here.
Popular Posts
-
Welcome to my latest weekly review of dividend increases. As part of my monitoring process, I review dividend increases that occured over t...
-
I review the list of dividend increases every week, as part of my monitoring process. This exercise helps me review existing holdings for di...
-
Hormel Foods (HRL) develops, processes, and distributes various meat, nuts, and other food products to retail, foodservice, deli, and commer...
-
As part of my review process, I evaluate dividend increases every week. This process helps me to see how my portfolio holdings are doing....
-
As a Dividend Growth Investor, my investable universe is the group of companies that have managed to increase annual dividends for at least ...
-
As part of my review process, I evaluate dividend increases every week. This process helps me to see how my portfolio holdings are doing. ...
-
We just had Black Friday and Cyber Monday. The Holiday Season is approaching. Everyone is rushing to buy gifts to the people that are most i...
-
There are two schools of thought when it comes to value investing. The first school of thought is that value and growth are connected at t...
-
I review the list of dividend increases every week, as part of my portfolio monitoring process. I leverage several of my dividend investing...
-
As a dividend growth investor, I invest with the end goal in mind . My goal, from the very beginning of my journey, has been to generate a c...